When evaluating arguments we must use reasonableness and beware of being "fallacious, unfair, or both"(371). Most fallacies are due to hasty generalizations and incorrect analogies. The major fallback of generalizing is that it most likely will produce probabilities and not certainties, which can also lead to stereotyping. We can test our reasoning by asking ourselves, is the evidence sufficient, representative and relevant. Refrain from assuming that two things that seem to alike in one areas with be alike in all other areas when drawing our analogies. We must take precaution in showing a connection between cause and effect. We must weigh our options and acknowledge all alternatives that may exist to show your fairness to the opposing opinions. Therefore, avoid making assumptions and provide sufficient evidence to support your argument. Reaching the readers on an unfair emotional level can be a pitfall, along with using “bias language” (378). In order to pose a fair argument, include the opposing writer’s argument but avoid quoting out of context.
Assuming ideas without proper evidence is something I will beware as I am posing my argument. I will also take caution showing the connection between the cause and effect, avoiding using my own opinion as evidence. I found this chapter beneficial for writing and supporting arguments. I believe this will help in the critical response assignments.
No comments:
Post a Comment